Claris now supports the RBI FREE-AI Framework — full automated compliance mappingLearn More
Enterprise · Healthcare

Explainable, Auditable AI for High-Stakes Clinical Decisions

When your AI recommends a diagnosis, flags a patient for risk stratification, or drives a clinical trial design — every decision must be explainable, bias-tested, and continuously monitored. ClarifAI provides the governance layer that clinical and regulatory teams require.

View Full Platform
The Problem

Clinical AI Without Governance Is a Patient Safety Risk

Healthcare AI is advancing faster than the governance infrastructure to support it. Diagnostic AI models trained on retrospective data can exhibit systemic bias against underrepresented patient populations. Risk stratification models deployed before a seasonal disease shift can silently misclassify patients. And when a clinician asks "why did the AI flag this patient?", the answer should not be a SHAP chart — it should be a plain-English clinical rationale that a physician can validate or override with documented justification.

68%
of clinical AI models exhibit measurable demographic bias at deployment
18mo
average time from model training to bias detection without continuous monitoring
100%
of FDA-cleared SaMD requires documented explanation capability
< 2s
time to generate a clinical-grade explanation for any AI recommendation
How It Works

Clinical AI Governance Pipeline

Continuous monitoring from model registration through clinical deployment.

01

Clinical Model Registration

Register diagnostic, risk stratification, and clinical trial AI models with full metadata: patient population, intended use, training data demographics, performance by subgroup, and regulatory submission status.

02

Demographic Bias Monitoring

Continuously monitor diagnostic accuracy, false negative rates, and risk score calibration across age, gender, ethnicity, and comorbidity subgroups. Surface disparities before they affect patient outcomes at scale.

03

Clinical Explanation Generation

For every AI recommendation, generate a clinician-readable explanation grounded in the model's feature attributions — not marketing language. Physicians can review, override, and document their clinical judgement in the same workflow.

04

Regulatory & Accreditation Documentation

Automatically compile documentation packages for CDSCO, FDA 510(k) AI/ML supplements, NABH accreditation, and hospital quality committees. Evidence is cryptographically attested and audit-trail linked.

Key Features

Governance for Every Healthcare AI Use Case

🏥

Diagnostic AI Monitoring

Continuous performance and bias monitoring for radiology AI, pathology models, and symptom checkers. Sub-population accuracy tracking across age, gender, and comorbidity groups.

⚕️

Clinical Explainability

Plain-English clinical rationale for every AI recommendation — formatted for physician review, not data science review. Integrates with EHR workflows for in-context explanation delivery.

📊

Patient Risk Stratification

Monitor risk score drift and recalibration needs for readmission, deterioration, and disease progression models. Automated alerts when population distributions shift from training baseline.

🔬

Clinical Trial AI Governance

Governance and explainability for trial participant selection, adaptive trial design, and biomarker models. Documentation formatted for FDA and CDSCO regulatory submissions.

🛡️

Privacy-First Architecture

Hybrid-BYOC deployment ensures all patient data stays within your hospital or health network infrastructure. Zero PII transmission to ClarifAI servers. HIPAA, DPDPA, and ISO 27001 compliant.

👩‍⚕️

Clinician Override Logging

When a clinician overrides an AI recommendation, the override reason is logged alongside the AI output, explanation, and clinical outcome — building a continuous improvement dataset for model revalidation.

Bringing AI Into Your Clinical Workflows?

Talk to a ClarifAI healthcare solutions specialist about your governance requirements before deployment.

View All Features